Como
VeneziaThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Como was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42' | Lucas Da Cunha (penalty) | 0.76 |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13' | Tasos Douvikas | 0.11 | blocked | |
| 24' | Lucas Da Cunha | 0.11 | saved | |
| 19' | Martin Baturina | 0.10 | blocked |
Shots: Como 19, Venezia 7; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 1 and 0.
In the first half xG was Como 1.42, Venezia 0.00: a clear edge for Como. In the second half xG was Como 0.24, Venezia 0.14: about even.
Como: +3.2 for the season (5 in the table). Venezia: −5.9 (19). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.