Juventus
NapoliThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Juventus was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69' | Kerim-Sam Alajbegovic | 0.02 | Edon Zhegrova | |
| 86' | Jeremie Boga | 0.03 | Andrea Cambiaso |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29' | Noa Lang | 0.14 | off target | |
| 85' | Jeremie Boga | 0.10 | blocked | |
| 15' | Jhon Lucumí | 0.09 | off target, from a corner |
Shots: Juventus 18, Napoli 8; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 0 and 0.
In the first half xG was Juventus 0.27, Napoli 0.30: about even. In the second half xG was Juventus 0.35, Napoli 0.16: about even. Juventus scored 2 from 0.63 xG: more than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Juventus: −3.8 for the season (7 in the table). Napoli: −7.2 (10). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.