Genoa
JuventusThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
Juventus created more (1.30 xG against 0.92) and left with nothing.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11' | Kingsley Ehizibue | 0.04 | Tommaso Baldanzi | |
| 27' | Tommaso Baldanzi | 0.10 |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91' | Nick Woltemade | 0.55 | blocked, from a set piece | |
| 66' | Nick Woltemade | 0.14 | off target | |
| 27' | Tommaso Baldanzi | 0.10 | goal |
Shots: Genoa 14, Juventus 17; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 0 and 1.
In the first half xG was Genoa 0.65, Juventus 0.14: a small edge for Genoa. In the second half xG was Genoa 0.25, Juventus 1.20: a clear edge for Juventus. The edge in chances passed from Genoa to Juventus. Genoa scored 2 from 0.92 xG: more than they created. Juventus scored 0 from 1.30 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Genoa: +0.7 for the season (13 in the table). Juventus: −3.8 (7). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.