Lecce
JuventusThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Juventus was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28' | Weston McKennie | 0.38 | Douglas Luiz | |
| 40' | Douglas Luiz | 0.03 | Federico Gatti |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28' | Weston McKennie | 0.38 | goal, from a set piece | |
| 20' | Willem Geubbels | 0.13 | off target, header | |
| 48' | Youssef Maleh | 0.09 | blocked |
Shots: Lecce 16, Juventus 8; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 0 and 1.
In the first half xG was Lecce 0.22, Juventus 0.51: about even. In the second half xG was Lecce 0.52, Juventus 0.28: about even. Juventus scored 2 from 0.80 xG: more than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Lecce: +1.1 for the season (14 in the table). Juventus: −3.8 (7). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.