Udinese
AC MilanThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: AC Milan was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5' | Christian Pulisic | 0.30 | Luka Modric | |
| 64' | Omari Hutchinson | 0.64 |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39' | Davide Bartesaghi | 0.68 | off target | |
| 64' | Omari Hutchinson | 0.64 | goal | |
| 79' | Keinan Davis | 0.45 | saved, from a set piece |
Shots: Udinese 12, AC Milan 19; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 1 and 4.
In the first half xG was Udinese 0.13, AC Milan 1.32: a clear edge for AC Milan. In the second half xG was Udinese 0.67, AC Milan 2.00: a clear edge for AC Milan. The edge in chances lasted the whole match. AC Milan scored 2 from 3.25 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Udinese: −3.5 for the season (20 in the table). AC Milan: +5.8 (4). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.