Paderborn
VfB StuttgartThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: VfB Stuttgart was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2.09 | −2.1 | 1.14 | |
| 2 | 2.59 | −0.6 | 1.67 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24' | Julian Chabot | 0.27 | Angelo Stiller | |
| 82' | Chris Führich | 0.11 | Angelo Stiller |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58' | Marvin Pieringer | 0.52 | off target, header | |
| 81' | Rayan Philippe | 0.46 | blocked | |
| 11' | Ermedin Demirovic | 0.33 | saved |
Shots: Paderborn 23, VfB Stuttgart 18; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 3 and 3.
In the first half xG was Paderborn 0.64, VfB Stuttgart 1.36: a small edge for VfB Stuttgart. In the second half xG was Paderborn 1.50, VfB Stuttgart 1.24: about even. Paderborn scored 0 from 2.09 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Paderborn: +0.6 for the season (13 in the table). VfB Stuttgart: +0.9 (8). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.