Fulham
Crystal PalaceThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
Fulham created more (2.88 xG against 2.36) and left with nothing.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2.88 | −0.9 | 1.67 | |
| 3 | 2.36 | +0.6 | 1.15 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10' | Joshua King | 0.12 | ||
| 34' | Tyrick Mitchell | 0.40 | Eddie Nketiah | |
| 41' | César Palacios | 0.54 | ||
| 53' | Tyrick Mitchell | 0.35 | ||
| 76' | Ben Chilwell | 0.39 | Daichi Kamada |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41' | César Palacios | 0.54 | goal | |
| 22' | Eddie Nketiah | 0.53 | saved | |
| 32' | Timothy Castagne | 0.49 | saved |
Shots: Fulham 25, Crystal Palace 10; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 2 and 6.
In the first half xG was Fulham 1.67, Crystal Palace 0.99: a small edge for Fulham. In the second half xG was Fulham 1.23, Crystal Palace 1.54: a small edge for Crystal Palace. The edge in chances passed from Fulham to Crystal Palace.
Fulham: −3.9 for the season (15 in the table). Crystal Palace: −2.5 (20). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.