Manchester City
Coventry CityThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Manchester City was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.19 | −1.2 | 1.81 | |
| 0 | 1.49 | −1.5 | 0.98 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25' | Erling Haaland | 0.37 | Antoine Semenyo |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77' | Phil Foden | 0.63 | blocked | |
| 79' | Ellis Simms | 0.49 | saved | |
| 23' | Jack Rudoni | 0.44 | saved, header |
Shots: Manchester City 15, Coventry City 12; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 3 and 2.
In the first half xG was Manchester City 1.27, Coventry City 0.82: a small edge for Manchester City. In the second half xG was Manchester City 0.94, Coventry City 0.68: about even. Manchester City scored 1 from 2.19 xG: fewer than they created. Coventry City scored 0 from 1.49 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Manchester City: +0.1 for the season (3 in the table). Coventry City: −0.8 (17). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.